Showing posts with label young people. Show all posts
Showing posts with label young people. Show all posts

Wednesday, 5 August 2009

Why do you engage?


We know people do public engagement for lots of different reasons; what are yours?

What motivated you to do it in the first place? What do you get out of it? What skills or experiences could you share? We're interested to find out so we can help give people more of a sense of what public engagement's like, and why they'd want to do it.
Let us know by commenting below.

Photo by: alexanderdrachmann

Wednesday, 1 July 2009

Working with schools

What can/should the CPE help with?
  • How to market your offer?
  • Can we have a one-stop shop for engagers with names, topics, lesson plans, session ideas etc.?
  • Yes to teacher panel
  • Can we have an artist in residence - earth science, nanotechnology etc.?
  • A public art/undergraduate competition
Tips for going into schools
  • Check out the school
  • Liaise about different abilities and class sizes
  • Different ideas for different classes
  • Plan for large group events, e.g. PSHE [Personal, Social and Health Education] days and assemblies
  • Work closely with teachers
  • Get a mobile number
  • Think about summer schools
  • Expect the unexpected!
  • Visit the National Curriculum website
  • Plan ahead (6-12 months at least)
  • Bring a risk assessment
  • Do it! It's not so bad the second time

Tuesday, 30 June 2009

ALSPAC - Lynne Molloy

ALSPAC, the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, otherwise known as 'Children of the 90s', is a longitudinal birth cohort study which follows the health of a number of families since 1991/2. The project has led to the development of a massive data set, providing a unique resource for scientists and social scientists alike.

Project participants are involved through clinical assessments, but also through filling in questionnaires, and the project is typified by a long history of communication with the study group. For example, regular newsletters are sent out sharing research findings in an accessible way. There is also a schools liaison officer who talks about the research in schools and, over the years, various parties and socials have been organised.

Some members of the cohort sit on the ethics committee and focus groups are a regular feature of the research. A really exciting development is the Teenage Advisory Panel -- TAP -- which was set up in 2006. There are 30 members, there is a dedicated participation worker supporting them, and TAP meets with the ALSPAC staff on a monthly basis, looking at how to make the project more interesting to the participants (e.g. developing incentive schemes, setting up a Facebook page, Twitter channel etc.) Participants are encouraged to get involved in the research process itself - applying for small grants to support this, something that the project will encourage in the future. They have also been involved in making project materials accessible and are now having an impact on the direction of the research. This is not only hugely beneficial to the project, but it has also given the public a voice in the research.

Read more about the project and how it moves beyond research in our online collection of Public Engagement Stories.

Alison Rivett presents ChemLabS

The ChemLabS programme does a massive amount of public engagement in schools, with staff and students getting involved in assemblies, putting on workshops to demonstrate experiments to primary school children etc. The children get to wear the full 'scientist' kit -- gloves, goggles, lab coats -- which they love as they get to feel like real scientists, doing experiments that they would never ordinarily get the chance to do.

Through targeting primary schools, this engagement work lets the children learn what science is all about and what it's like to be a scientist, hopefully inspiring the scientists of tomorrow. It also gives postgraduate students a chance to talk about their research with young school pupils and develop skills communicating their work to different audiences.

ChemLabS has started to charge schools of this to sustain the programme, but the staff also provide information to schools regarding accessing funding. This is a controversial issue, but what do you think about it? How else can this successful programme be sustained?

Further references